$25,000,000 Bonus

A $1,000,000 mansion

What do these have in common?  Simple – they are things you would probably do something different to get.  You might sky dive, you might bungee jump, you might make a few more cold calls every day.  In other words they could influence your behavior if you were given the opportunity to earn them.

And they are huge awards.  So huge in fact, you might do something outside your normal comfort zone to earn them.  You might cheat a coworker, you might figure out how to scam the system, you might lie to a client. 

And that's a big clue that the program will have unintended consequences.  And trust me you don't want that.

Take a moment and look at yesterday's Dilbert cartoon

Dilbertpandemic

Even the Pointy-haired boss has an inkling that something is amiss.

I know there is a lot of pressure to show an ROI and the only way to do that is to tie it some outcome, some metric.  Unfortunately, the typical response in order to ensure a positive ROI, is to have the program focus on a result (outcome) and tie it to a big award.  However, when the award is huge and it's based solely on a result, there is a natural tendency for participants to maximize their return and find a way to shortcut the process and get the award.  

Marry your outcome based goals with behavioral goals to keep the program in check.  The behaviors – the things the individual can control – should bear the weight of the program.

Putting too much of the award on the outcome communicates you don't care how they hit the goal – just that they hit it.

Ask the folks on Wall Street how that worked for them?

  • Scott Crandall

    Paul — Ask the folks on Main St. how Wall St.’s rewards worked. Great point about “outcomes only” bonuses. How about some guidelines or indicators to look for? Future post?

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Hmmm… one of the problems with guidelines is they become standards and then that will eventually be a problem.
    I always look at it this way – if the participant thinks the goal is tough but not impossible then you’re probably okay. If they think the award isn’t enough – you’re probably okay too. Most participants want big awards, little work.
    As long as they don’t hit you – you’re probably in the right ballpark for the program. I know it’s a wishy washy answer but every program is different – the effort will be different, the market conditions will be different, the goals will vary, etc.
    I think we got in trouble with Wall Street et.al because of “that’s the standard package” mentality.
    Sorry – if you all need solid answers – that just may mean we’d have to talk and maybe work together? Hint, hint. :)

  • http://www.awards.co.za Barry Coltham

    Great Article Paul – Thanks
    The question about rules is also relevant – a great gudileine rule, which may be overstating the obvious, is that the behaviours must align with the values of the organisation. Values, as a rule, are not ethically challenged and usually expressed positively

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Thanks Barry – Obvious or not – the more we state that programs and their rules should reflect the mission/values of the organization the better.
    It was a pleasure having lunch with you at the Motivation Show – hope all is well in S. Africa!

More in Uncategorized (279 of 817 articles)