Is the Best Offense a Good Defense? (Bare Naked Ladies at end of post)
Is there something wrong with being defensive? I mean – if you're constantly defending a position against an onslaught of negative and erroneous information is that a bad thing?
For the past few weeks/months it seems that I spend more time defending the position that rewards and recognition are not bad things – just things badly done. Yet it seems that either I don't have the reach required or people just don't care (or – and this is highly unlikely – I'm not right.)
I've posted a response to Dan Pink's video saying rewards are bad, bad, bad.
I've posted numerous times on how you can't blame the program if it's poorly conceived and executed – blame the plan designer. But alas and alack it seems for naught.
And once again, find myself in the position where I feel I need to post about an article with so-so information and in some cases just wrong.
So I'm asking you all – should I post again about this?
Hopefully you will respond – let me know – should I just keep my head down and tell my story or take the time to respond to the "academics" and ill-informed?
I leave it in your hands. Please let me know in the comments.
I may not sleep until I hear from you (video courtesy of Bare Naked Ladies – curious to see how that reference affects my rankings…)
Email subscribers may need to click through to see video below…
-
http://profile.typepad.com/6p01157000e148970c femelmed
-
http://www.bretlsimmons.com Bret Simmons
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert
-
http://hrringleader.wordpress.com Trish McFarlane
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert
-
Scott Crandall
-
http://deltaorg.wordpress.com/ George A Guajardo
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert
-
Drew Hawkins
-
http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert






