It seems I've typed the name Dan Pink more than my own over the past few months.  His marketing machine has been working overtime and I give a tip 'o the hat to those folks.  Not many books focused on motivation get the amount of attention that his book “Drive – The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us” is getting.  Mad props to your marketing team!

Starting with his short speech at TED where he outlined the "candle problem" and the effect external (extrinsic) incentives had on creative problem solving, and culminating with the release of this book on December 29, 2009 – the buzz about motivation and how we're all doing it wrong almost reached Michael Jackson proportions on twitter and the blogosphere.

Not wanting to fall into the same trap as the converted and shoot my mouth off about something I hadn’t even read, I gave up responding to tweets about “incentives don’t work” and “rewards kill motivation” and “Dan Pink for President” and decided to wait until the book was released and see what the fuss is about.

Driveshadow2 I received a pre-release copy from the publisher (thanks guys) and promised not to review it online until January 4, 2010 (today.)  I’m sure it has something to do with the New Year’s Day web discussion held for the first 500 who could show receipts for books (again – respect to his marketing folks.)  

The picture at the right shows the number of things I found interesting enough to tag while reading the book.  It does have some good info.

Two Part Review

Today I’ll give you my impression of the book.  Tomorrow – I’ll spend more time getting into some of what is included, where it makes a lot of sense, where I think it’s wrong and how I think it will hurt business in the short run.  But today – it’s simply recap/impressions info.

Part I – Drive –What’s it all about…

First and foremost this is not a tome.  It isn’t as deep a book as first impressions would convey.  At 242 pages it seems to initially have some heft and depth.  Not true.  Here’s a breakdown of the book based on number of pages – pie-chart-wise:

Pinkchart4

As you can see – only about 30% of the book is dedicated to the “new theory of motivation.”  The “tool kit” section has the same number of pages.  The tool kit includes some very general applications for individuals, companies, non-profits, teachers, and parents as well as a suggested reading list, some “guru” biographies to check out (I'm not included, frown), a recap of the book (in other words this section of the book…includes content from… the book – somewhat circular), and a two-page glossary of terms.

When you break down the book this way it is obvious that this is more of a really, really big white paper that repackages a lot of other people’s information into a nice, very well-organized, package.  As a practitioner of motivation theory, I probably could have gotten by with just the recap as I’m already familiar with many of the studies and theories Mr. Pink reviews in the book.

It Is Interesting

If you’re looking for a book that will, for once and forever put a nail in the coffin of reward programs (sorry Kohn fan-boys) this isn't it.  While Mr. Pink makes some “good” arguments for pushing intrinsic motivation over extrinsic, he also bends to the real world and outlines some places where rewards can, and should be used.

The net-net of this book is:  

People will work hard and with desire if the work provides them with the autonomy to do the work their way, provides them with the ability to work toward mastery of the task and finally, provides them with a purpose over and above the task itself.  

No one could argue with that point of view.

More Like a Three Musketeers Bar than a Snickers

Threemusketeers The book however, is pretty one dimensional – highlighting only those studies and “opinions” that support the idea that world has changed, work has changed and therefore motivation techniques should change.  I liken the book to a Three Musketeers bar, yeah – it is a chocolate bar, but it’s whipped up and full of air providing you with a lot less complexity than say a Snickers would, with all the various flavors and ingredients.  

If you are against incentives – this book will be your bible.  If you believe in incentives you won't find a very balanced discussion.  That's the missing piece.

It is not a definitive treatise on how to drive performance in an organization, and I believe it will have negative effects on business.  I echo the comments made in the Herman Group's HR predictions…

Misunderstanding Dan Pink's new book, "Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us", some employers will abolish their reward programs altogether. This ill-advised shift will cause significant, negative, unintended consequences.

And that leads me to my single biggest concern.  

This book is so well marketed, so well packaged, it is the fast food of human behavior for the HR class and any marketer charged with influencing behavior. Based on the level of critical thinking I’ve seen in a lot of blog posts and tweets about this subject I believe it will cause more problems than it solves in corporate America.

Packaged for Social Networks

Drivestuff This book is packaged for social networks (expect to see more of this!)  Mr. Pink actually provides a “twitter” version of the book, a cocktail party discussion summary, and then recaps of the individual chapters.  It is almost as if this book was designed around Seth Godin’s “idea virus” concept.  Mr. Pink conveniently provides all the appropriate germs for spreading the concepts in this book for maximum contagion.  The photo at right shows you all the bits and pieces that came with my book.  A lot of work went into making sure this book gets read and talked about.  I am again, in awe of his marketing smarts.

Tomorrow – The Real Fun

Tomorrow I’ll post most of my critical review on the book with why I think it is good for business – and why I think it is off the mark.  Stay tuned.  Same Drive Channel – Same Drive Time.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

  • http://profile.typepad.com/hindaincentive Hinda_incentive

    I’d have to agree on the impressiveness of his personal marketing strategy. It sounds like he could’ve have written almost anything in the book and still sell just as many books. Looking forward to your insights tomorrow.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Tomorrow I’m a bit more analytical. Today was just the fluff. I didn’t want to do one huge post so I broke it up. Thanks for reading. It will be interesting to see how this shakes out. Either Drive will be something people talk about for a long time – or it will die a very quick death. How’s that for predicting the future?

  • http://www.bretlsimmons.com Bret Simmons

    Autonomy, personal mastery, purpose – nothing new under the sun there Paul, but I don’t have to tell you that. We’ve known about the power of that stuff for quite some time, so this can’t be a “new theory” of motivation.
    It might generate a lot of buzz, but I seriously doubt it will revolutionize the practice of leadership and management in American business. But keep your eye open for a whole new wave consultants trying to hawke it, just like they did engagement.
    Here we go..

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Thanks Bret… my biggest concern is that the slick packaging will create a desire to rid the world of all “if – then” incentives, and through collateral damage, some really well-designed recognition activity.
    I think you’ll see in my more detailed review of the content in tomorrow’s post there are some big flaws in the underlying premises he uses to support this “theory.”
    It is unfortunate that in today’s sound-bite, twitter-byte world this type of information grows quickly with little critical thought. But you’re right – there will be at least one consultant hawking it – Mr. Pink being one of them.

  • http://compforce.typepad.com/compensation_cafe/ Darcy

    Dan Pink is also a guest on Talk of the Nation (NPR) today. The audio will be on the website around 6:00 tonight if that can add anything to the discussion.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Thanks Darcy – I’ll check it out.

  • http://www.unitedincentives.com Jeff Broudy

    Nice summary, Paul.
    I read his other books and once again, he like many popular business authors, makes a controversial or newsy argument to validate his opinion. So it is designed to sell.
    Publishing is a tough business with rigid goals and financial advances against performance. Given Mr. Pink’s focus on marketing communication and buzz to sell his book, it appears his motivation is as extrinsic as it is intrinsic.
    He’s opened the door to discussion and we should welcome the exposure and discussion.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Good point Jeff – is his motivation about mastery or about money? I do want to be clear – what he says is important. Giving people the ability to do what they do best, and work toward a goal bigger than the task is motivational. I just take issue with the positioning that this is the ONLY way to do it in the future – as if we’ll evolve (his metaphor not mine) over night.
    Thanks for commenting Jeff.

  • Paul Beaumont – DipS, MCIM, Chartered Marketer (Student – MA Sales)

    Can’t wait for the second instalment!
    Re your comment about Alfie Kohn and fiscal rewards; I’ve just completed a literature review of Herzberg’s works and now believe Kohn’s comments are unfounded.
    Kohn references Herzberg’s KITA principle (Kick in The Arse) as a substantive reason for “Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work”. He takes Herzberg’s concept of positive psychological KITA and embellishes it. However Herzberg’s concept is unsubstantiated in terms of fiscal reward systems. Sure the Motivation/Hygiene model collects events relating to salary, but as Herzberg’s states “incidents relating to salary invariably included stories about pay rises”. (…not bonus schemes!)
    In summary, Herzberg had no data pertaining to reward systems and was therefore not in a position to comment. Herzberg’s analysis technique is known as “interpretivism”, he uses process logic (not empirical evidence) to reach his conclusions. So it becomes critically important to understand his subjective, axiological approach. As he’s a self-proclaimed radical humanist, his interpretation is designed to emaciate employees from the clutches of “cruel industrialists”. Therefore anyone with a different belief system can derive an alternate process logic driven conclusion.
    The “dog kicking” analogy does not readily fit with positive psychological incentives. Doesn’t Herzberg know; young dogs are frequently trained to do anything using treats (a process of incentive and reward)? Fiscal reward systems for salespeople needn’t be different. 90% of all salespeople want bonus schemes (so they are motivated by money), however there’s also strong evidence to suggest focus on work content diminishes, whilst focus on the reward is high.
    So why not take a lesson from man’s best friend (animals are frequently studied in behavioural science) Use fiscal incentives to positively reinforce the correct selling behaviour and (as with dogs) start to reduce dependency on the rewards once the correct conditioned response has been installed. Thereafter utilise rewards sparingly to incentivise short-term fiscal imperatives or sharp changes in selling strategy/tactics (you can teach an old dog new tricks)
    A well trained dog might start on treats, but ultimately they are virtually withdrawn, so the dog becomes focused only on the task or command in hand.
    Money motivates – fact! …It is the effective implementation of fiscal rewards that’s at issue.
    (See also “Rethinking Rewards”. Harvard Business Review Nov-Dec 1993 pp.37-49. – It’s a fantastic riposte to Kohn’s outlandish comments)
    Regards
    An Old Sales Dog (Give me 95% salary/5% bonus and I’ll work like a dog every day of the week!)

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Paul – thanks for the comments. I do agree that incentives work – and they work well. Mr. Pink does agree with this – but his point is similar to Kohn in that the reward becomes the focus and therefore can have terrible, unintended consequences. Incentives do work – short term – and designed well – can be used to guide behavior. I wouldn’t want EVERYTHING in an organization be subject to incentives. That would be as bad as not using them at all.
    My biggest concern with the book isn’t that he’s wrong – is that it is right in CERTAIN circumstances but it is so well packaged that many will assume his approach works in ALL circumstances and that will cause more problems than the incentives he’s so against.

  • Pingback: Tickets-News.de

More in Uncategorized (249 of 817 articles)