Gearshift Over at Fistful Of Talent (arguably one of the most popular HR blogs) I posit the idea that Managers should have their own true “manager” certification program and have Managers re-certify regularly.

Unfortunately at most companies Managers don’t need to be certified nor is "management certification" something companies look for or expect.

What I've seen instead is that companies pick the functionally proficient employee and make them the manager.  The classic application of this principle is in sales where the top sales person is promoted to Sales Manager and fails miserably.  And you get a double whammy – not only does the company lose the sales from the top sales person – they also lose all the sales from all the other sales people due to the new Manager doing their job poorly.

Managers are critical to a company’s success.  And I mean Managers at all levels – not just those with BMWs and assigned parking spots.  Management isn't a function of being functionally literate in your area of work – it's about how you translate company goals and objectives into day-to-day work and how you grow people in an organization.

A long while back (January of 2007 – yeah, almost 4 years ago) I wrote this about Managers…

"What hit me is that middle managers act as the transmission in an organization.  They are tasked with bridging the gap between strategy (engine) and tactics (wheels.) 

I think that as our economy relies more on creativity, relationships, managing tacit knowledge and managing less measurable things, then the need for quality transmissions should be growing not shrinking and the value of  good middle managers should be increasing.  Even with a powerful engine a car can't go anywhere without the transmission.  Transmissions also sense the load on an engine and adapt accordingly.  Managers do the same – keeping people from burning out under increasing loads."

If in fact Managers are a critical component in your company’s drive train – shouldn't they be inspected, certified and repaired as needed to make sure they’re doing the job?  

What say you – should managers be held to the same level of certification as say – Accountants?  Or your HR personnel?  Hit me in the comments after reading both my old post and my new one at Fistful of Talent.

  • Yathi Yatheepan

    I mostly agree with you. Even we have to renew our driving license every 4 years and the renewal requires a vision test. If we consider our self as the manager of our vehicle operations on the road, this is the certification to operate the vehicle on our highways. In our organization, supervisors and managers have to go through mandatory recurring training.
    On the other hand, I feel, functionally proficient employees should be given the promotion as managers when an opportunity arises. This is an incentive for their hard work. By giving some additional learning experiences, the deficiencies in their new role can be subsided. The nature of enthusiastic hardworking people is that they will become proficient in their new role as manager. If the functionally proficient employees are not given the opportunity to grow, the organization may end up losing them.

  • Bohdan

    I don’t believe certification would accomplish what you’re looking for. Should managers be evaluated based on managing and not just task completion? Sure. But task-completers are great at jumping through a (certification) hoop and then contining to do what comes naturally to them.
    Good management isn’t just a skill set, it’s also a mindset.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    Thanks for commenting Yathi. Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I think that functionally proficient employees can still increase their income and their status through additional functional training, becoming subject matter experts and being given more challenging functional assignments. I don’t think that all functionally proficient employees should be managers simply because they are good at a task. That’s where we make mistakes promoting our best managers. HR and the various functional areas need to think through how they can give people career paths that may not include managing. Some folks just won’t be good at getting the most out of people and shouldn’t be managers. Management should never be the only career path. IMHO. Thanks for your comment.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/2of6 Paul Hebert

    I think a well-designed management training process would weed out those that are simply good at taking tests and studying. The training would require them to demonstrate the skill set you mentioned- which I agree is just as important if not more so, than the functional abilities. Thanks for commenting Bohdan.

More in Uncategorized (146 of 817 articles)